Is AI Overhyped? Apollo Sees No Payoff Beyond Tech

TL;DR: Torsten Slok, Apollo's chief economist, says AI has delivered no financial payoff outside the Magnificent Seven. Revenue per worker and profit margins are rising for those seven companies and flat for the S&P 493, the rest of the S&P 500, according to Apollo. It is one economist's reading, not a verdict on AI.

His conclusion, in Apollo's own Daily Spark note, is that the AI story will be decided in the S&P 493, and that so far there is no evidence revenue growth or margins are improving outside the tech sector.

What did Apollo actually find?

Apollo found that revenue per worker is rising for the Magnificent Seven but flat for the S&P 493, and that profit margins follow the same pattern, according to Apollo. For everyone else, they sit still.

Measure	Magnificent Seven	S&P 493
Revenue per worker	Rising	Flat
Profit margins	Rising	Flat

The table restates Apollo's two charts and nothing more.

Slok did not hedge. In the line TechCrunch quoted, the technology "has delivered zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech."

Why would spending pull back?

Because some companies now treat AI as a cost, not a source of growth. Slok said, as Yahoo Finance reported, that mainstream corporate America is pulling back and starting to view token spending as a cost center that weighs on margins.

Spending has fed the AI boom, and if buyers outside tech cut back, the revenue that supports tech valuations has less room to grow, which matters to anyone holding those valuations at index weight. That is the risk.

Is this a warning about the economy too?

It fits a wider pattern of caution, though it is a separate analysis. Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius wrote, per Fortune, that the growth impulse from the AI boom was set to peak in late 2026 or early 2027.

Fortune also reports that Goldman estimates the AI "wealth effect" added 0.4 percentage points to U.S. consumer spending growth over the past year. That is the stock market's gains showing up in what households spend, and if AI-linked stock prices stall, that support weakens.

Two firms reading the same boom from different angles do not make a forecast. They do show that serious economists are asking where the money actually comes back.

What does this mean for you as an accredited investor?

Start by checking how much of your portfolio is one bet. If you hold an S&P 500 index fund, you own the Magnificent Seven at index weights, plus 493 companies that Apollo says show no AI lift yet. The first group drives most of the story.

Private holdings deserve the same look. A venture or growth position built on AI demand from non-tech customers depends on exactly the spending Apollo says is pulling back. AIN covered how crowded the trade has become in our piece on hedge fund exposure to the Magnificent Seven, and how a sponsor's story can run ahead of its numbers in our analysis of Apollo's gated private credit fund.

One caution on the source. This is one economist's reading of two groups of companies, so treat it as a data point, not a verdict.

Common mistakes when reading this kind of call

The most common one is treating "zero payoff so far" as "zero payoff ever." Slok's claim covers what the numbers show today. He also posed the open question of whether the economy can turn cheaper intelligence into higher revenue growth and margins, as heise online reported.

Another is assuming a broad index is a hiding place. It isn't. The S&P 500 still contains the seven biggest AI names, so an AI bust would reach it too, only less sharply than it would reach a tech-heavy fund.

A third is quoting a headline number you cannot trace. Go to Apollo's note.

FAQ

How much of AI is just hype?

Apollo's data does not say AI is useless. It says the financial gains so far sit with the Magnificent Seven, with no sign of revenue or margin improvement across the other 493 S&P 500 companies. Whether that changes is the open question.

Are economists worried about AI?

Some are cautious about the spending. Goldman's Jan Hatzius expects the AI growth impulse to peak in late 2026 or early 2027, per Fortune, and Apollo's Slok sees no payoff outside tech so far.

Has artificial intelligence gone too far?

The sources here do not answer that. They address returns, not limits. What they show is a concentration of gains in seven companies and flat results elsewhere, which is a question about investment, not capability.

What is the S&P 493?

It is Apollo's shorthand for the S&P 500 without Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla, according to TechCrunch.

One thing to do today

Open the holdings of every fund you own and add up your total exposure to Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla across all accounts. That number tells you how much of your portfolio rests on the group Apollo says is the only one profiting from AI so far.

Educational content only. Not investment, tax, or legal advice. Not an offer or solicitation to buy or sell securities. Past performance does not guarantee future results. Private-market investments are illiquid and involve risk of loss, including total loss of capital. Consult qualified advisers. Angel Investors Network is not a broker-dealer or investment adviser.