The PE Secondaries Market: How LPs Buy and Sell Private Equity at a Discount

    The PE Secondaries Market: How LPs Buy and Sell Private Equity at a Discount TL;DR: The private equity secondaries market hit $233 billion in transaction volume in 2025 according to Lazard , up from $132 billion in 2021...

    ByJeff Barnes, MBA
    ·13 min read
    Reviewed by Jeff Barnes — CEO of Angel Investors Network · MBA · $1B+ in Capital Formation
    The PE Secondaries Market: How LPs Buy and Sell Private Equity at a Discount
    The PE Secondaries Market: How LPs Buy and Sell Private Equity at a Discount

    TL;DR: The private equity secondaries market hit $233 billion in transaction volume in 2025 according to Lazard, up from $132 billion in 2021 and now a permanent feature of global capital markets. In May 2026, CPP Investments sold 33 fund interests to Blackstone Strategic Partners and Ardian for roughly C$4 billion. That deal is a textbook signal: even the world's most sophisticated institutional LPs sell private equity positions on the secondary market when it serves their portfolio goals. For accredited investors, secondaries offer discounts to NAV, a compressed J-curve, and access to known portfolios. Here is how the market works and how you can get in.

    A $233 Billion Market That Most Investors Have Never Heard Of

    The secondaries market is where existing limited partners sell their fund interests to new buyers before those funds complete their 10-to-12-year life cycle. The seller transfers both the remaining unfunded capital commitment and the right to all future distributions. The buyer steps into the LP's shoes at a price negotiated between them, typically expressed as a percentage of the fund's current net asset value.

    Three major research firms published 2025 volume estimates within a close range. Lazard surveyed 85+ secondary investors and counted $233 billion. Evercore tallied $226 billion. McKinsey's 2026 Global Private Markets Report came in at $240 billion. All three represent more than 40% year-over-year growth from the prior full-year record of $162 billion in 2024.

    Dedicated secondary capital — money raised specifically to buy secondary positions — reached $327 billion by end of 2025. Jefferies projects full-year 2026 volume approaching $300 billion. This is no longer a niche escape valve for distressed LPs. It is a fully developed, institutionally dominated asset class.

    LP-Led vs. GP-Led: Two Markets in One

    Two transaction types divide the secondaries market roughly in half, and they operate very differently.

    Feature LP-Led (Traditional) GP-Led (Continuation Vehicle)
    Who initiates The existing LP wants to exit The GP wants to hold assets longer
    2025 volume ~$116–117B (~50% of market) ~$115–116B (~50% of market)
    2014 share of market ~81% ~19%
    Typical pricing (2025) 88–90% of NAV for buyout 99.5% of NAV for single-asset CVs
    Conflict of interest Low. GP is not a direct counterparty. High. GP sits on both sides.
    LP choice Seller decides exit timing Existing LPs choose cash out or roll into new vehicle
    SEC protection Standard Fairness opinion required under 2023 SEC Private Fund Adviser Rules

    LP-led transactions are straightforward. The seller hires a secondary adviser (Evercore, Jefferies, Greenhill Cogent) to run a competitive bid process. Buyers review a data package, conduct diligence on the underlying portfolio companies, and submit bids as a percentage of NAV. The fund GP grants transfer consent under the LPA but is not a direct party to the economics.

    GP-led continuation vehicles are more complex. The GP moves one or more portfolio companies out of an aging fund and into a new vehicle. Existing LPs choose: take cash at current NAV or roll into the new structure alongside secondary buyers. The GP continues managing the assets. GP-led volume grew from $35 billion in 2020 to $115 billion in 2025, more than tripling in five years.

    The CPP Investments Deal: What a $4 Billion Secondary Sale Looks Like

    On May 20, 2026, CPP Investments announced the completion of a sale of 33 limited partnership fund interests to Blackstone Strategic Partners and Ardian for net proceeds of approximately C$4 billion (roughly USD $2.9 billion).

    CPP Investments manages over C$675 billion in assets. This is not a distressed seller. Tom Kapsimalis, Managing Director and Head of Secondaries at CPP Investments, described it plainly: the sale provided an attractive opportunity to optimize exposure and supports disciplined capital allocation. Those 33 fund interests had been accumulated over approximately 20 years. The sale was a portfolio rebalancing decision, not a liquidity crisis.

    The buyers tell you something too. Blackstone Strategic Partners manages approximately $100 billion in secondaries AUM. Ardian, the Paris-headquartered firm that closed its ninth secondaries fund (ASF IX) at $30 billion in January 2025, the largest secondaries fundraise in history, co-purchased the portfolio alongside Blackstone. When the two largest dedicated secondary platforms in the world compete to buy the same assets, pricing reflects real market depth.

    This deal is the current market signal you need to understand. Sophisticated institutions use the secondaries market as a deliberate capital allocation tool. Not as a last resort.

    Why LPs Sell and Why Buyers Buy

    LP motivations for selling are well-documented. Jefferies H1 2025 data breaks them down: 48% of LP sales were opportunistic liquidity and portfolio rebalancing. 25% were administrative clean-up. 23% sought to reduce exposure to non-core managers. 4% aimed to lock in returns or de-risk.

    The DPI problem is real. Distributions to paid-in capital hit an 11-year low in 2024 at just 11%, per Bain's Global PE Report 2025. LPs are waiting longer for natural liquidity from fund exits. The secondary market provides an alternative. You take a discount. You get cash now instead of waiting three more years.

    The denominator effect adds mechanical pressure. When public market values fall, as they did after the Liberation Day tariff shock in April 2025, private equity NAVs reprice slowly. That makes PE a larger percentage of an LP's total portfolio than its target allocation allows. The result forces selling regardless of the LP's preference.

    Secondary buyers have a different calculus. Three structural advantages drive demand.

    Discounts to NAV. Buyout portfolios traded at 88% to 89% of NAV in H1 2025. Infrastructure and senior credit traded in the mid-to-upper 90s. Venture capital positions traded below 65% of NAV in 2023 before recovering. The 10% to 15% discount on a buyout portfolio provides an immediate embedded margin of safety. Even after discounts narrowed from 20%+ a decade ago, the buyer is compensated for providing liquidity and absorbing remaining duration risk.

    Shorter J-curve. Primary PE fund investors face 7 to 10 years before meaningful distributions. Secondary buyers acquire mid-cycle interests. The early-stage investment period and its negative returns are already in the past. Secondary fund investors may receive meaningful distributions within 2 to 5 years. Holding periods for secondary funds run 5 to 7 years, not 10 to 12.

    Known portfolios. Primary fund investors commit capital before knowing what companies the GP will buy. That is a blind pool. Secondary buyers purchase interests in funds that already own specific, identifiable companies. You can read the audited financials, review operating metrics, and form a real view on the underlying businesses before you bid.

    Who Dominates the Secondary Market

    The secondaries market is increasingly competitive. The ten largest buyers accounted for just 51% of capital deployed in 2025, down 14 percentage points from four years ago as new entrants, traditional buyout funds, and retail vehicles entered the space. But the largest dedicated platforms still dominate by scale.

    Ardian is the world's largest dedicated secondaries firm by AUM, with $200 billion in total assets under management or advisory. ASF IX closed at $30 billion in January 2025, the largest secondaries fundraise in history. Ardian focuses on high-quality PE assets in North America and Western Europe across LP-led and GP-led transactions. It co-bought the CPP portfolio with Blackstone in May 2026.

    Blackstone Strategic Partners manages approximately $100 billion in AUM across secondaries, co-investments, and GP stakes. Strategic Partners IX raised over $22 billion. Its infrastructure secondaries fund (Strategic Partners Infrastructure IV) closed at $5.5 billion in September 2025, the largest infrastructure secondaries fund ever raised. Strategic Partners X is currently in the market targeting above $20 billion.

    Coller Capital is a UK-headquartered pioneer of the market since 1990. Its ninth fund (CIP IX) closed at its hard cap of $12.5 billion and is approximately 70% deployed. Coller's founder Jeremy Coller, who coined the term "secondaries," described 2025 as the market's "finest hour."

    Lexington Partners, now part of Franklin Templeton, targets above $20 billion for Lexington Capital Partners XI. It is one of the oldest and largest dedicated secondary managers globally.

    The GP-Led Controversy: When the GP Sits on Both Sides

    GP-led continuation vehicles carry a structural conflict that every accredited investor must understand before gaining exposure to them through a secondary fund.

    In a continuation vehicle transaction, the GP owes fiduciary duties to existing LPs who are being offered an exit at current NAV. Simultaneously, the GP is the counterparty acquiring those same assets into a new vehicle it will manage. One party sets the price. That same party benefits from the price being set lower for exiting LPs (more upside left in the new vehicle) and higher for the new incoming investors (easier fundraising). This is an inherent conflict.

    The SEC addressed this in its 2023 Private Fund Adviser Rules. SEC-registered advisers conducting adviser-led secondary transactions must obtain an independent fairness or valuation opinion and distribute it to LPs before the election deadline. LP Advisory Committees should approve the transaction. Market data on single-asset continuation vehicle pricing (99.5% of NAV on average) suggests pricing is generally fair. But critics note that figure depends entirely on the accuracy of GP-set NAVs.

    CV-squared transactions are continuation vehicles built on top of existing continuation vehicles. They emerged as a notable trend in 2025. These multi-layered structures allow GPs to retain assets indefinitely beyond the original fund mandate, extracting fees and carry on the same assets across multiple vehicle generations. Watch for them. They are the outer edge of GP-favorable structuring.

    One alignment indicator: average GP commitment to continuation vehicles has been approximately 9% of total commitments, well above the 1% to 2% typical for primary funds. GPs rolled 100% or more of realized carry proceeds in 88% of CV deals. That is genuine skin in the game. It matters.

    How Accredited Investors Access the Secondaries Market

    Institutional secondary funds (Ardian ASF IX, Blackstone Strategic Partners IX, Coller CIP IX) require $5 million to $25 million minimums. You will not access them directly as an individual accredited investor. But three pathways exist.

    Wealth management platforms. iCapital Network manages over $880 billion in platform assets including $220 billion in alternatives. It aggregates commitments from 108,000 active financial professionals into institutional-scale fund subscriptions, dropping effective minimums to $25,000 in many cases. CAIS operates a similar model. These platforms vet managers, handle administrative complexity, and make secondary fund access practical for high-net-worth individuals.

    Registered '40 Act secondary funds. Hamilton Lane's private secondary fund is registered with the SEC under the Investment Company Act of 1940, making it accessible to qualified purchasers and accredited investors through standard brokerage channels. Its filing (Form 424B3, filed 2025, SEC CIK 2041398) is publicly available. Evercore data shows that buyers using '40 Act fund structures won approximately 85% of their bids, pricing on average 500 basis points above competing bids. Structural deployment advantages matter.

    Direct secondary fund commitments. Some secondary managers accept commitments from institutional family offices and qualified purchasers at $1 million to $5 million minimums through feeder fund structures. Minimum investment for direct participation in institutional vehicles typically runs $5 million or above.

    Access Vehicle Typical Minimum Liquidity Example
    iCapital / CAIS platform $25,000–$250,000 Locked. Fund terms apply. Multiple secondary managers on platform
    Registered '40 Act secondary fund $25,000–$100,000 Quarterly or semi-annual tender offers Hamilton Lane Private Secondary Fund
    Feeder fund / managed account $1M–$5M Locked. Underlying fund terms apply. Varies by manager
    Direct institutional fund commitment $5M–$25M+ Locked 5–7 years Ardian ASF IX, Blackstone Strategic Partners X, Coller CIP IX

    Risks: What Can Go Wrong

    Secondary investing is not risk-free. Four specific risks apply.

    NAV accuracy. Secondary pricing is based on fund-reported NAV. Private company valuations are updated quarterly with significant lag and methodological discretion. A portfolio trading at 90% of NAV could be trading above intrinsic value if NAVs are stale or optimistic. Diligence on the underlying portfolio companies, not just the NAV certificate, is the only defense.

    Discount compression. Secondary fund returns are partly a function of buying at a discount. As dedicated secondary capital exceeded $300 billion and competition among buyers intensified, average discounts compressed from 20%+ historically to 10% in 2025. Thinner discounts mean smaller embedded margin of safety. Returns depend more on underlying portfolio performance than on entry pricing.

    GP-led conflict risk. As described above, continuation vehicle transactions involve structural conflicts. A secondary fund manager with weak governance standards or inadequate diligence on GP-led CVs exposes you to overpaying for assets at prices set by a conflicted counterparty.

    Illiquidity and lock-up. Even with a shorter J-curve than primary PE, secondary funds are illiquid. Closed-end vehicles lock your capital for 5 to 7 years. Evergreen and interval fund structures offer periodic redemption windows, but managers can suspend redemptions during market stress. Invest only capital you can afford to leave locked.

    Your Next Step

    Start by reading iCapital's secondary market educational content at icapital.com. It is institutional-quality and free. Then ask your financial advisor whether your current portfolio has any exposure to secondaries. If you have existing PE fund commitments, your J-curve position and current allocation will determine whether adding secondary exposure makes sense as a complement or a redundancy.

    If you are evaluating a secondary fund investment on a platform like iCapital or CAIS, request the manager's full fund history: IRR and TVPI across all vintage years, LP-led versus GP-led deal split, and their conflict-of-interest policy for continuation vehicle transactions. If those numbers are not available, the manager is either too new or not being forthcoming. Neither is acceptable before you commit.

    Author Disclosure: Jeff Barnes, MBA has no personal position in any company, fund, or platform named in this article. Angel Investors Network has no current commercial relationship with any party mentioned. AIN provides marketing and education services, not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal.

    Looking for investors?

    Browse our directory of 750+ angel investor groups, VCs, and accelerators across the United States.

    Share
    J

    About the Author

    Jeff Barnes, MBA