Private Credit Just Raised $119 Billion in One Quarter. BDC Defaults Just Hit a Record Too.
Private credit funds raised $119 billion in the second quarter of 2026 alone, the fastest single-quarter pace on record, at the same time loan defaults inside the funds that hold this debt hit their...

The fundraising number nobody in this market expected
Private credit funds took in $190 billion in the first half of 2026, a 53% jump over the same period in 2025, according to fund-flow data compiled by With Intelligence. That figure already equals 80% of everything the industry raised in full-year 2025, which itself totaled $240 billion. Direct lending, the strategy where funds make senior loans directly to mid-sized companies instead of buying them from banks, pulled in $73 billion in Q2 2026 alone. Its H1 total of roughly $100 billion sits just $6 billion short of the strategy's entire 2025 haul.
Two mega-funds anchored the half. Hayfin closed its fifth flagship direct lending vehicle at €15 billion ($17.5 billion), one of the largest European private credit funds ever raised. Churchill Asset Management closed its Middle Market Senior Loan Fund V at $16 billion, combining its main fund, an evergreen vehicle open to individual investors, and separate accounts. Geography is shifting too. North America generated only 38% of global fundraising in H1, down from roughly 50% in 2023 and 2024, while Europe held 23%, down from 29% a year earlier. Multi-region strategies, funds that invest across borders rather than committing to one continent, picked up the difference at 37% of the total.
Specialty finance, a catch-all term for asset-backed lending against things like equipment leases, consumer receivables and royalty streams, is where the money is now concentrating fastest. The strategy closed more than $37 billion year-to-date through Q2 2026. Ares Pathfinder III alone closed in June 2026 with $8.5 billion, the largest asset-backed finance fund ever raised. Specialty finance accounted for 23 of the new private credit funds in development as of Q2's end, the largest share of any strategy tracked. Capital is rotating toward newer, less-tested corners of the market at the same time the older, more established corner is flashing warning signs.
What the default data actually shows
Fitch Ratings put a hard number on the deterioration. Its private credit default rate, a trailing 12-month measure covering roughly 1,300 to 1,500 U.S. borrowers, climbed to a record 6.0% through the second quarter of 2026, up from 5.7% in the first quarter, according to Fitch's own release. Fitch logged 32 default events from 20 new defaulters in the quarter, pushing the trailing 12-month defaulter count to 84. The rate has stayed at or above 6.0% every month since April 2026, and Fitch's most recent monthly update pegged it at 6.1% for the period ending July 2026. Smaller borrowers are carrying the load: issuers with $25 million or less in EBITDA, a proxy for annual cash earnings, defaulted at a 12.3% rate in July, roughly triple the 3.9% rate for the next size band up.
Blue Owl Capital's flagship direct lending fund defaulted 2.8% of its loans in the second quarter, its highest level in at least five years. That is one fund at one manager, but it is the same manager whose executives are publicly defending the asset class, which is worth sitting with.
A second, quieter signal comes from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Researchers there examined SEC filings from 168 business development companies (BDCs), the publicly registered fund structures that make most of this lending and file detailed quarterly disclosures the rest of the private credit market does not. The Boston Fed's August 2026 paper found the share of BDC loans carrying payment-in-kind (PIK) terms, meaning the borrower adds unpaid interest to the loan balance instead of paying cash, rose from about 6% in early 2022 to roughly 10% by early 2026. That is a 67% increase in three years, and it shows up broadly across industries rather than in a handful of troubled sectors, which the researchers read as a sign of cash flow pressure spread across the middle market rather than isolated distress.
The table below lines up the key numbers from 2022 against where they stand in 2026.
| Metric | 2022 (or earliest available) | 2026 (latest available) | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fitch private credit default rate (trailing 12 months) | Below 4% (pre-2024 tracking baseline) | 6.0%-6.1% (Q2-July 2026) | Record high, up from 5.7% in Q1 2026 |
| Share of BDC loans on PIK terms | ~5.4%-6% (Q1 2022) | 9.8%-9.85% (Q1 2026, peak Q4 2025) | Up roughly 67% over three years |
| Blue Owl flagship fund defaulted loans | Below 2.8% (five-year low point) | 2.8% (Q2 2026) | Highest in at least five years |
| Top 10 non-traded BDC redemption requests (share of assets) | Not comparable; gating was rare | 13% (Q1 2026), 14% (Q2 2026) | Forced gates at most managers |
| Direct-lending spread over leveraged loans | Above 300 basis points (2017-2018 vintage) | Below 100 basis points (Q1 2026) | More than two-thirds compression |
| '40 Act private credit assets (BDCs, interval funds, tender-offer funds) | Smaller base, rapid growth phase | ~$654 billion (Q1 2026), BDCs ~$561 billion | Assets edged down Q4 2025-Q1 2026 on redemptions |
Redemptions are the mechanism connecting the default data to your own account statement. Investors in the top 10 non-traded BDCs, funds sold to individuals rather than institutions, asked to redeem an average of 13% of assets in the first quarter of 2026 and 14% in the second, according to With Intelligence data cited by InvestmentNews. Most managers responded by activating redemption gates, contractual limits that cap how much of a quarter's redemption requests actually get paid out. If you hold shares in one of these vehicles and want your money back, the fund does not have to give it to you on your schedule. That is disclosed in the offering documents. It is also easy to forget until the moment you need the cash.
The bull case, stated plainly
Managers are not staying quiet about this. Blue Owl's Marc Schultz has said there has been no meaningful change in the firm's credit watchlist, the internal list of loans flagged for extra monitoring. Blue Owl co-president Craig Packer has separately said the firm's credit indicators remain sound. Their argument, in plain terms: a 2.8% default rate at one fund, or a 6% market-wide default rate, is not a crisis by historical standards, and PIK usage can reflect negotiated flexibility with a borrower rather than an admission that the borrower cannot pay.
There is a real argument behind that framing. Fitch's own data shows the rise in defaults is concentrated in smaller borrowers and specific sectors, healthcare providers and industrials and manufacturing among them, rather than spread evenly across the entire private credit market. Rate relief, if it comes, would lower the floating-rate debt service burden that has squeezed borrowers since 2022, when benchmark rates moved off zero. Fitch itself projects median borrower leverage declining to 5.9x EBITDA in 2026 and 5.5x in 2027, which would ease pressure over time rather than worsen it.
PIMCO strategist Lotfi Karoui, quoted in Benzinga's August 2026 report, points to a split worth watching closely: BDC bonds have recovered from an earlier stretch of underperformance, while BDC equities are pricing in growing skepticism about the net asset values managers report each quarter. Bondholders and shareholders are looking at the same portfolios and reaching different conclusions. Karoui also flagged that the spread advantage new direct-lending deals command over public leveraged loans fell from more than 300 basis points in the 2017-2018 vintage to under 100 basis points by the first quarter of 2026. You are being paid less to take the same illiquidity risk than lenders were eight years ago, even as defaults climb. That compression is either a sign the asset class has matured and priced risk more efficiently, or a sign competition among managers chasing $190 billion of inflows has pushed underwriting standards past where they should be. The Boston Fed researchers lean toward the second read, noting that rising PIK usage alongside compressing spreads is "consistent with mounting competition in private credit markets" that may be "eroding lending standards."
Why this divergence matters if you are deciding whether to allocate
You do not need to pick a side between the managers and the skeptics to act on this data. You need to know what you are actually buying. Private credit funds sold to accredited investors, meaning you meet income or net worth minimums set by federal rules, are largely illiquid. The SEC's own investor bulletin on non-traded BDCs states this without hedging: shares cannot be sold on an exchange, and you can generally only redeem when the fund chooses to offer a repurchase, typically quarterly. When 13% to 14% of assets in the largest funds are lined up for redemption and gates activate, that liquidity promise gets tested in real time, not in a hypothetical. FINRA has separately flagged non-traded BDCs for targeted regulatory scrutiny, an added reason to read the redemption terms before you sign, not after you need the cash.
Ask three questions before you commit new capital. First, what is the fund's current PIK percentage, and how has it moved over the past eight quarters. A number climbing toward or past the 9.8% industry level the Boston Fed documented is worth a direct question to your advisor or the fund's investor relations desk. Second, what is the fund's redemption history over the past four quarters, and has it gated. A fund that gated in 2026 will very likely explain it as prudent portfolio management. It is also a fund that did not have the cash on hand to meet what investors asked for. Third, how does the fund's reported net asset value compare with where its own bonds, if it has any outstanding, are trading. Karoui's bond-versus-equity divergence is a market-based check on manager-reported valuations, and it costs you nothing to look up.
None of this means private credit is a bad allocation. Direct lending has delivered senior secured, floating-rate income that outperformed public credit for much of the past decade, and the largest managers in the space have underwritten thousands of loans through multiple cycles. It means the record fundraising pace is not, by itself, evidence that the underlying loans are healthy. Those are two separate facts, and 2026 is the year they stopped moving together.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a BDC and why does its structure matter here?
A business development company is a closed-end fund structure, created by Congress in 1980, that lends to or invests in smaller and mid-sized companies and is required to file periodic reports with the SEC. That reporting requirement is why researchers at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston could analyze 168 BDCs in detail. Most other private credit vehicles do not disclose loan-level data publicly, which means BDCs currently offer the clearest window into how this market is actually performing.
What does a payment-in-kind (PIK) loan mean for me as an investor?
PIK means the borrower is not paying cash interest on part or all of the loan. Instead, that interest gets added to the loan's principal balance, to be paid later. It shows up as income on the fund's books today even though no cash arrived. A rising PIK share across a fund's portfolio, the trend the Boston Fed documented moving from roughly 6% to 10% since 2022, signals more borrowers are struggling to generate the cash flow needed to service debt at current interest rates.
Why are redemption gates activating at so many funds right now?
Non-traded BDCs and similar '40 Act vehicles typically offer to repurchase a limited percentage of shares each quarter, often around 5%, specifically because the underlying loans cannot be sold quickly without a discount. When redemption requests hit 13% to 14% of assets, well above what most funds are structured to pay out in a single quarter, managers cap the amount actually redeemed. Investors who requested cash back receive a partial payment and wait for the next quarter, a mechanism spelled out in the fund's offering documents before you ever invest.
Does a rising default rate mean private credit funds are about to fail?
Not on the evidence available now. Fitch's 6% trailing 12-month default rate is a record for the period it tracks, but it remains below stress levels seen in high-yield bonds or leveraged loans during past recessions. Blue Owl executives have publicly defended their credit indicators, and Fitch itself projects median borrower leverage declining through 2027. The honest read is that credit quality is deteriorating at the margin while fundraising accelerates, a divergence worth monitoring closely rather than a sign of imminent failure.
Author Disclosure: Jeff Barnes, MBA has no personal position in any company, fund, or platform named in this article. Angel Investors Network has no current commercial relationship with any party mentioned. AIN provides marketing and education services, not investment advice. Past performance does not guarantee future results. All investments involve risk, including loss of principal.
Part of Guide
Looking for investors?
Browse our directory of 750+ angel investor groups, VCs, and accelerators across the United States.
About the Author
Jeff Barnes, MBA
Continue Reading

The Private Credit Illiquidity Premium Is Quietly Disappearing

WMA SEALS Offshore Fund Hits $359.6 Million: What the Form D Reveals About Liquid Alts

The Denominator Effect: Why Family Offices Are Quietly Cutting VC Allocations in 2026

Long/Short Equity Hedge Funds: Why Market Neutral Does Not Mean Safe

Why Europe's Shrinking Share of Private Credit Fundraising Is the Buying Signal U.S. LPs Are Missing
